My nYNAB feedback
Giving nYNAB a whirl for a second time two years later...
With that said, I started using YNAB Pro way back in 2007 when there wasn’t even multiple account registers, it was just one big transaction log. I’ve been very involved with the beta process in YNAB 3 and YNAB 4, but since the method has worked so well with my finances, I have become less and less involved in the forums and only periodically look for threads that peak my interest. Going back to when I started, I had a good-paying seasonal job with very seasonal expenses (i.e. college student). I used my credit card for all purchases, and always paid it off before the due date to maximize my rewards. I thought I had a paid-in-full credit card, however, I was actually living on the credit card float. I could not pay the entire balance in full with money in my account the day I started YNAB. That was a wake-up call for me. Luckily, I had some big paychecks come in and I got off the credit card float. However, I was still using YNAB like a “normal” budget where I budgeted based on expected income. This is dangerous. The real light bulb moment was when I decided to build a buffer (yes, that’s what it was called back then!). Once I built a buffer and began marking paychecks as income for next month, that is when my finances really hit cruise control and I finally had control. Money had not been an issue since, and that was somewhere around fire season (summer) 2008.
I know I’ve definitely evolved into one of the “advanced” users, as I have multiple real paid-in-full credit cards. I track all my retirement accounts and health savings accounts. I have an on-budget investment accounting where I use a large “future savings” category to absorb any gains/losses that the investment account incurs, because I was accumulating TOO MUCH cash in my checking account and wanted to put some of it to work. THANKS TO YNAB! I’m also a CPA by trade, and I go as far to track my investment asset allocation monthly in excel, and have a tax planning schedule that I update with each paycheck such that I monitor my retirement contributions so that I stay in the 15% marginal tax bracket. So yes, I’m not your average user. However, I would like to believe that I have some perspective helping many users from a wide range of workflows over the last 10 years. (YES, 10 YEARS!)
I’m a user that wants to support YNAB because of what the software has done for me. However, YNAB4 is absolutely amazing, and I have a hard time signing up for something monthly that I am dependent on. So, this post is mostly for me to compare YNAB4 to nYNAB, and help to make my assessment as to whether or not I will upgrade. Alright, enough about me. Here goes my feedback. I’m going to try to rank things in a logical meaningful order to ME.
1. The universal Undo/Redo feature is great!
2. Direct connect is awesome! I was shocked to be able to import transactions within my retirement and health savings accounts! It also downloads Target and Capital One which pocket sense did not! Win.
3. I discovered that you can now set the zoom in google chrome, and it remembers the settings for that website. For example, I set the zoom to 75% for my nYNAB budget, and then when I go to other websites it reverts back to 100%. Awesome! Adjustable font!
4. I’m happy to see the goals feature implemented. It is very simple in this version, and doesn’t accomplish as much as I would like it to, but it is a start. You will see enhancements I will like to see further down.
Features that are absolutely deal-breakers for me:
1. Post-dated transactions need to be able to affect the register and budget. The register and schedule need to be separate. I need the ability to enter to register transactions that are committed. For example, I have a recurring transaction for all of my automatic payments. Once I receive the statement, verify the date and amount of the next scheduled occurrence, I would enter that in the register from the schedule so that my account and category balances reflect what I am absolutely committed to.
2. Bring back income for this month and income for next month. That was the life-changing rule from YNAB Pro that got me to where I am today.
3. TBB needs to behave like ATB YNAB4. I need clear monthly breaks. When there is budgeting in the future (causing future month’s TBB to be negative), if you decrease a budgeted amount in the current month, it should increase the current month’s TBB and not flow forward to the future months’ TBB.
4. Payee settings. With direct connect, we need working payee settings just like we had in YNAB4. Otherwise things will get messy quick.
5. I would like an offline desktop app.
6. I would like to be able to see multiple months side-by-side.
I will still not be upgrading to nYNAB at this point as there are several dealbreakers for me. YNAB4 is just too good and even if nYNAB was free, I would not be making the switch until that happen. That’s before I even factor in the price of permanent monthly subscription that puts me at the mercy of whatever design changes the YNAB team dreams up. That’s scary.
I guess I'm trying out nYNAB for the next 30 days as well, as I had to sign up for a free trial to keep my username for this new forum (well played, YNAB ;).
I'm definitely interested to see what you think at the end of your trial. I also love YNAB4, and at this point in time, I am probably unlikely to switch. I really don't want to pay the yearly subscription, which would cost me more in Cdn dollars.
But I do like how nYNAB functions. I do wish they had the month-to-month view in the new one. Also, there's no calculator, which I use all the time.
Thank you for sharing your view Joel . I do share some of your concerns, and converting from YNAB version 4 to the current version had not been easy for me too. Of all of new YNAB potential customers, perhaps YNAB4 users are the most difficult ones to convince. I believe that is because so many had benefited (and continue to benefit) from the version 4 method and the software.
I waited a year after the initial release of the new YNAB before I converted. And sure, I too would like to be able to see more than one month side by side, and to be able to fence off months. At the moment, it is simply not there and it may never be implemented.
Still, after almost one year of using the new YNAB, I think I adjusted to the new functionality and some of the changes to the method. I am quite happy with some of the added functionality such as the goals feature and also the functionality of the mobile phone app which allows me to do almost everything I need.
I believe that for YNAB as a company to remain in business, and to be able to develop further in a competitive landscape, they had to adopt a different business model. I can only imagine how challenging it must have been to the company to make these changes and take great risk with the aim to advance further.
I personally feel that I owe so much to YNAB, that I do not mind paying an annual fee. For me personally, I think it's worth it, even though I cannot use some features such as automatic download of transactions because I live overseas in Europe.
I also owe to this great and inspiring community of users, most of whom are so helpful to new users.
In the last four years, my net worth grew from €13K to €204K -- all because YNAB made me more aware of my spending and allowed me to prioritize properly (mainly, stick to a budget and ensure excess funds are used to pay off the mortgage).
Keep up the good work, and keep on budgeting, and yes, please try the software for yourself.
Hey Joel ,
Your YNAB journey is beautifully impressive - thanks for sharing! We love hearing feedback from such longtime users because you know just how far YNAB has come, so we take your comments with that in mind!
I wanted to make sure we addressed some of those features you said you'd like to see in the new YNAB:
1. Post-dated transactions do affect your budget, but not as far as considering those funds already spent. The Quick Budget feature in the new YNAB takes into account any post-dated transactions as Upcoming and allows you to budget for them in your budget. This way, those transactions you're already committed to can be planned for in your budget.
2. While we understand just how effective it can be to set aside funds for a certain month, the new YNAB is a bit more flexible. At any point in time, you can move forward and budget funds towards next month (or the month after). This allows you to stretch the funds you currentl have as far as you can.
3. Flowing well from the point above, we only suggest budgeting towards the future if expenses for the current month are covered - this prevents that negative future budgeting being covered by new income in the current month. There isn't a clear cut line here because we want things to be flexible and work not just in the current month but with future months in mind as well.
4. Payee settings are alive and well in the new YNAB! To access them, you'll have to use the web app - click on the name of your budget in the upper left hand corner and select Manage Payees.
5. We don't have a desktop app for the new YNAB right now, but it's in our plans. Although we aren't able to commit to how much offline capability that app will or won't have, we are working hard on making it a great companion to the web app.
6. The side-by-side feature hasn't been brought to the new YNAB, but I'll let our development team know you'd like to see it! This will add it to the list of possibilities for the future!
If I missed anything, please let me know!
P.S. - I'm moving this over to our Tips & Tricks section, just in case anyone wants to add in on what they do to handle like situations!
Regarding Joel 's dealbreakers #2 and #3, I think I have a way to mimic the YNAB4 method in the nYNAB.
I agree that the clean breaks of months is what makes YNAB4 so powerful. "Ring fencing" is months is critical to correcting bad behavior. I used YNAB4 for three years, holding off on transitioning to the new web-based approach for the same reasons. I thought I'd give it a try.
Here's my idea: Whenever you get "inflow" money, do NOT categorize it as "Inflow: To Be Budgeted". Instead, create 12 budget categories, one for each month of the year (e.g. "January Budgeting", "February Budgeting", ..., "December Budgeting"). Deposit the entire amount in the budget category for next month...(remember "living off of last month's paycheck"...). For example, I received a paycheck on December 1, so I entered it as a deposit into my "January Budgeting" category.
Then, come January, reverse out everything in that budget category, and reallocate to your regular monthly budget categories.
I may be wrong, but I think this will create clean monthly breaks and address the problem with accidental overspending in the current month being "blindly" funded from future months. This is what nolesrule was rightly complaining about. You will now see negative amounts in the current month.
This may not be the officially supported approach, but if it works in practice to address this terrible shortcoming of nYNAB, I would love to get everyone's thoughts on it.
I truly don’t understand how people can operate without the walled months. It baffles me. I’m only 34 but I feel like an old geezer not willing to give up my antiquated ways. I can’t even describe the numerous ways walled month makes more sense to me. This is probably *the* one thing holding me back from nYNAB (red arrows is BIG but I can deal with it... I think... I hope...)
Really the only reason I want to upgrade is to have the transactions ordered in the order they were entered (by time).
I need the income to show as such for reports (taxes). But I've been jumping ahead to the following month and budgeting any income to its own holding category there. In the current month's header I see the amount of income I'm dealing with currently, and if that is even then I'm good. (It probably helps that I'm doing some income leveling and habe set our monthly amount to use as income to a nice even hundred dollar amount. Not sure yet if a discrepancy would be likely, but so far I like being able to easily cross check my budgeted amount. ) In the category next month I can see how much income I've accumulated for 'next month'. Still working on my trial, and have only crossed one month boundary, but so far so good.
Agreed, much of the other changes are things I can deal with, but I really didn't want to lose the ability to force myself to leave next month's money alone. Start dipping into it a little and it's a slippery slope! If needed/desired, I want it to be a very conscious move on my part. For me the big advantage of the new is proving to be direct import and being able to deal with transactions on my phone or tablet. More frequent contract with my budget is good, and less onerous than having to have the computer out/on.
I have just taken the plunge after using YNAB 4 since 2014. It has taken me this long to at least sign up for the trial as I was reluctant for very similar reasons to OP and others here. (I have recently started University as a 'middle-age' student and the 1 year free was pretty enticing to give it a red-hot crack). Once I am further into my trial I will also likely give my feedback, but so far, my feedback is very similar to that of OP. Please bring these features back or least give options. Whilst I understand the simplicity of nYNAB for new users, it is missing one of the most fundamental components of YNAB4 - the ability to separate the months as in OPs points 2 and 3.
TLDR: User of YNAB4 since 2014, just started nYNAB trial. Overall, so far I agree with all of OPs original points.
I agree with this post. I have been using YNAB4 for years, but mostly as tracking and not really budgeting. Now I bought a house with my girlfriend who has 2 kids and now we are budgeting HARDCORE mode, and I thought that it would be good to see what YNAB has done in their cloud solution.
The first thing I thought was: "What is this? Where are all the months side by side"? One of the BEST things about YNAB4 was that you could have multiple months side by side and make fast educated guesses on you next 2-3 months on where you should put your money. I know you can see a lot of details on each category, but you have to click through all of them, including to see notes. It is a really slow process to get information, that I can get really fast in YNAB4.
The most powerful thing with the cloud YNAB is that you can use it effortlessly across devices, and that is something that is really good. But the lack of overview information is a dealbreaker for me. I will probably use my 34 days to look deeper into the new YNAB, but my gut right now tells me that I will probably revert back to YNAB4 within a few days sadly.
Having ran a trial of YNAB4 and nYNAB I have come to this conclusion.
YNAB4 has the superior system
nYNAB has the superior software
If they would have kept the process and mechanics of YNAB4 and ported it into an web/mobile app for nYNAB it would be great. Instead they moved the software into the 21st century while REGRESSING the process. Yes there are workarounds, but honestly it should not be up to the user to use workarounds to fix the bad process of nYNAB.
Also it seems with nYNAB they have gotten greedy. In my mind the ideal price point for nYNAB is $40-$60/yr (more on the lower end with requiring all the workarounds it needs to get it to really work).
Having spent the last few weeks looking at other budgeting systems. Despite YNABs regression it still seems to the best available, but it still woefully inadequate itself. nYNAB has opened the door for a competitor that gets it right and isn't greedy asking for $80/yr, maybe just maybe that should be my next project.