
New Color Scheme Lacks Contrast (Especially For Those With Color Blindness!)
The new color scheme simply doesn't work. The new colors not provide enough contrast. With my type of colorblindness, I can barely see the difference between the red & green. They actually look very much the same at a glance and I can really only spot the difference when I take a really close look. This is bad. Like really really bad.
Please don't make this the only option! You have literally broken a very important part of the design for a lot of people. Please revert ASAP until you can find a better design than this (or at least give us the choice in the settings!).
-
Purple Admiral said:
With the toolkit you just toggle on the features you want, click save, and restart your browserIt isn't necessary to restart your browser: just refreshing/reloading the page will put the changes into effect.
-
Molly McGuire said:
Sometimes I get the feeling the developers get restless on their lunch hours when there's no projects pending,I doubt there are no projects pending ever: there must be a mile-long list of feature requests from users looking for improvements.
-
Hang on, am I reading all the comments from Support correctly? The development team researched and decided on these changes? From a professional UI design point of view I could have told you beforehand that your solution makes things worse for people with deuteranopia and protanopia. From a professional web development team lead point of view I can tell you that you don't let the development team decide on this without the guidance of an experienced interface designer.
YNAB please hire somebody with a decent number of user interface design experience under their belt. YNAB seems to have been lacking in this area for some time now, and a change for the better never seems to come.
-
I'm not keen on this new colour scheme but I can work with it. It is harder to distinguish the colours though and how they can say they have increased the contrast with these new colours I have no idea. I certainly would like the option of keeping the old colours as they do stand out much more clearly when you glance at them on the screen.
-
What I don't get is why the YNAB product managers and designers didn't think that users should be offered choices? "Skinning" aka "Themeing" has been available for sites for a very long time. Wikipedia has several "official" skins, and many more unofficial ones. With CSS, it's not hard to make a selector for users to chose "themes". Just implement that, and let your users choose! Example: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8796107/how-to-make-changeable-themes-using-css-and-javascript#8796160 Cheers!
-
FLMark80 said:
No. You are incorrect. They said they try to fix for colorblindness - more specifically the red/green colorblindness, which they failed.Honestly I don't really care if you think I'm right or not and the support people in this thread have done a terrible job explaining the change. This is what they said directly from the blog post linked in the release notes:
"Over the last year, we’ve made a few small changes to the Available amounts to make them more accessible, as well. We added visual signals to the Available amounts to make it clear whether there was credit overspending or an underfunded goal. We also increased the size of the negative sign for overspent categories. Both of these changes help users with visual impairments easily scan their budget by relying less on a color-based signal.
Today, we’re introducing some changes to the colors themselves used in the Available column.
What’s changed? We significantly increased the contrast between the color of the background (the “pill”) and the text, while muting the background color. These changes increase the contrast in general, which makes the text easier to read for everyone.
This is a very small change, and is coming first only to the web app. While this helps with readability, we still use red and green to send signals about Available amounts, which isn’t the ideal experience for anyone with red-green color blindness.
As a part of some larger visual changes, we’re looking at how to send these signals in ways that don’t rely on color at all."
There is nothing about this change that was intended to improve the ability of red/green color blind individuals to distinguish between the colors.
-
Just chiming in here that these color changes are terrible, and I still don't understand why they won't let us customize our experience when I know it's not that difficult to do. Isaac C. posted a lovely work-around that even lets us choose our own custom colors, but I think that after nearly ten years of YNABing, they are finally trying to force-feed me more than I can handle.
-
I respect what you are trying to do, but (for someone without any color blindness) you've broken or weakened a critical feature of the product. One of the strengths of the product was supposed to be that once organized, YNAB would quickly call out positives and negatives. This color means a problem, this color means a warning, and this color means available cash.
With this change you've weakened the visual impact of each critical color and thus made the product harder to use. This should really be an option provided to the user.
You are also requiring all of your users to "re-learn" how to use the product, for zero or questionable gain. Considering your product already requires a fair amount of learning or reorienting to use properly, this is a little obnoxious.
-
My problem is not so much with the new colors, though the colors are making the real issue worse, which for me is the font. The font itself now doesn't have enough weight/contrast. Here's a screenshot of what I'm seeing vs what they posted. I have to lean in and squint more now because the font is too thin to easily read against the new background colors.
-
Faness Nicole Just now, I spent way too much time trying to find the problem with my budget only to realize I was overlooking an overspent category because the new colors are not visible. This has got to change.
So where is our feedback? You both just completely stopped responding in this post. And why is this taking so long? It should not have taken more than 1 meeting at YNAB HQ to figure you made a huge mistake with this change. The evidence is too overwhelming for an even halfway reasonable person to think otherwise.
This update should have been backed out days ago. Why hasn't it been? Is the strategy here to just keep telling us "we're listening to the feedback and well evaluate our plans" and hope we eventually just give up? And why are you sticking with a change when its clear you got it 100% wrong?
-
I would just like to share a screen shot of some changes I made using toolkit options that others might not know about. I recently saw some of these options in a screen shot someone else posted and I'm glad I did!
- Blue "pill" for monthly goal not yet met with the little clock icon
- In toolkit select "Goal Indicator Warning Color"
- Green, bold positive balances with no background
- In toolkit select "Unhighlight all Positive Category Balances"
- Red is overspent category - this is default
- Yellow is overspent credit card spending with icon - this is default
I also increased the zoom on that website and it helped me see the numbers more clearly. On my computer (PC, using Chrome) on the website I hit the CTRL button and use the scroll on my mouse to zoom in or out. I saved as a favorite and the browser remembers how much you have zoomed in and keeps it that way!
- Blue "pill" for monthly goal not yet met with the little clock icon
-
Veronica at YNAB said:
the changes both impacted some users negatively and some users positively,I have to agree with Technicolor Cheetah. It seems as though there have been dozens of complaints, both from people with color blindness issues, and those without, whereas there might be a half-dozen or so who have said they "like the new colors," which is not to say the new colors help them. This is really absurd. Again: for the record, I don't any color-related sight problems, but I've gone out of my way to remove the new color scheme because it makes seeing line items worse.
-
I think the new colors are great. My eyesight is excellent. Ignoring the fact that people who have color-vision related disability can’t see them is arrogant and abilist. I also like stairs. I can climb them. But my building has an elevator because some people can’t climb stairs and it doesn’t matter how much the rest of us like and use the stairs.
Relying on the fact that some of us like the change as the explanation is cowardice and you may not use my opinion as an excuse for bad design that actively makes the product worse for people with a disability. That anyone would suggest that is an acceptable reponse is insulting to all of us.
Roll the change back.
-
I don't have vision problems beyond glasses-corrected poor eyesight, but the new scheme is harder to read. I not sure how white on a bold starkly different color has less contrast than a non-white color on a lighter version of the same color. Also not sure how much heavy testing could have been done if the comment that these new color combinations don't even pass some Web AIM standards is true...
I used the solution Isaac C. posted to go back to the other scheme, which works great, but people shouldn't have to install extensions and custom themes to make using the product possible, especially if it's as a result of a change made to previous behavior.